Sharyl Attkisson investigates voter irregularities and fraud in 2020: It turns out there's more to it than advertised in the media.
Listen to this podcast by clicking the arrow in the player below. Or listen on iTunes or your favorite podcast distributor under "The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast" and "Full Measure After Hours."
Subscribe, Share, Review and Follow my podcasts on Twitter @TheSharylPodcast @FullMeasureAH.
Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today
Unique gifts for independent thinkers
Proceeds benefit independent journalism
Brenda Hart says
What ever happened to your original list of 'questions that should be answered' that you complied shortly after the election? I have looked for subsequent answers but had hoped to see an update issued by you. That's the only way I would trust the explanation. Please reissue your list with any answers you have found.
Abuncha Dems says
Is this it?
Thank You Sharyl for revisiting the 2020 election. The following article published 3 weeks after the 2020 election did a great job of summarizing how surprising and inconsistent the 2020 Presidential Election were yet the mainstream media ignored these issues.
5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms
Surely the journalist class should be intrigued by the historic implausibility of Joe Biden’s victory. That they are not is curious, to say the least.
By J.B. Shurk November 23, 2020
Ed Eichman says
Comparing this election to others always meets with the same rebuttal: "this was a one of kind election, so it doesn't compare".
There is an approach that does not rely on that.
Every competitive presidential election is decided by the swing states.
There were 9 (by my count) swing states. So 18% of the states would decide the election.
On election night, for the first time in history 8 cities in 7 states had counting "interruptions". Big red flag. If you are not counting, what exactly are you doing? Room for shenanigans.
All 7 of those states were in the group of 9. The probability math is 9/50x8/49x7/48 etc. resulting in a .000036% chance that was "natural". So 1 in 277,000. If you start therem it's really up to them to prove it was a "perfect election".
Barbara Martin says
Thank you 😊 for doing and giving us the news as it should be given!!
Basically letting us decide for ourselves what to believe and what not to believe!
I’ve enjoyed your news broadcast for years!! Keep up the great work!!
Jeffrey Lawrence Olson says
Is there a transcript for your outstanding podcast, Sharyl?
Sharyl Attkisson says
Thank you for your comment and support. At this point in time, we do not have transcripts for the podcasts. Sorry!
James Shellabarger says
The fraud by Myers doesn't surprise me. What surprises me is that he was prosecuted.
Ed Eichman says
You missed "it was a perfect election". I had never heard that uttered, because it's impossible. Then it was no fraud, no evidence of fraud, not evidence of widespread fraud, not enough widespread fraud to change the outcome. This sounds like CCP on the lab leak.
All discussions should be preceded by this simple fact:
there were 9 swing states. For the first time in history counting was "suspended", not in one dem controlled city but 8 in 7 states (PA had two).
ALL 7 were from that 18% of states. The probability math is 9/50 X 8/49 etc. which gives .000036% chance that was a natural event. Why did ZERO non-swing states have a problem?
Julie De Luca says
The MSM is the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.. The host on CNN wasn’t questioning President Trump, she was debating him.
Mike Aiello says
If there's the potential for a follow up on this story, I strongly suggest reading up on the posts at https://zarkfiles.substack.com/archive?sort=new
He and NY Citizen's Audit have been dong yeoman's uncovering the existence of cloned voter registration ID's in NYS voter rolls that are sure to exist in other states, and the algorithms used to created such ID's.