Republicans in Congress have called for an immediate review of reported reprisal against IRS investigators who raised concern about the Hunter Biden investigation.
In a letter to the Office of Special Counsel, the lead Republicans on the Senate Budget and Investigations Committees, Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) reiterated the rights and protections provided to whistleblowers under the law. Joining in the letter are the heads of the House Ways and Means Committee, the House Oversight Committee, and the House Judiciary Committee: Jason Smith (R-Mo.), James Comer (R-Ky.), and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
Two IRS whistleblowers and their investigative team were removed from an investigation into alleged crimes and violations committed by the son of President Joe Biden, Hunter. The removals were in apparent retaliation for their legally protected communications with Congress, according to Republicans.
In emails following the disclosures by the whistleblowers, senior IRS managers failed to properly notify employees that they have the right to report wrongdoing to Congress and executive branch authorities. That’s according to the Republican members of Congress.
The importance of protecting whistleblowers from unlawful retaliation and informing whistleblowers about their rights under the law cannot be understated. After all, it is the law.
Republican lawmakers
Any effort by federal agency managers to enforce a nondisclosure policy that fails to include a disclaimer outlining whistleblower rights– is against the law.
Read the lawmakers’ letter to the Office of Special Counsel here or below:
July 5, 2023
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have reportedly engaged in unlawful whistleblower retaliation against veteran IRS employees.1 Multiple news reports indicate that the whistleblower and the investigative team were removed from the Hunter Biden investigation by the IRS at DOJ’s request as retaliation for making protected whistleblower disclosures to Congress.2 We are also aware that in response to these disclosures, Acting Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) Kareem Carter sent an email to supervisors, including to the whistleblower, stating that no information involving the investigation can leave the field office without first going through the chain of command directive by seeking approval from a supervisor.3
This email failed to include the anti-gag provision as required by 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(13), as well as included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act.4 The anti-gag provision prohibits the use of appropriated funds and the enforcement of a nondisclosure agreement or other restrictive policy, form, or agreement that does not specifically allow for lawful, protected disclosures and that each policy, form, or agreement must use specific language apprising the employee of their rights to make such disclosures.5 Specifically, the anti-gag provision prohibits the use of government funds to implement or enforce any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement if it does not contain the following statement:
1 Chris Pandolfo and Gillian Turner, IRS whistleblower letter accuses DOJ of retaliation in Hunter Biden probe, Fox News (May 16, 2023) https://www foxnews.com/politics/irs-whistleblower-letter-accuses-doj-retaliation-hunter- biden-probe; Alayna Treene and Sara Murray, IRS whistleblower who claims to have information of alleged mishandling of Hunter Biden probe removed from investigation, CNN (May 16, 2023) https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/16/politics/irs-whistleblower-congress/index html.
2 Anders Hagstrom, IRS whistleblowers claim retaliation in connection to Hunter Biden complaint, Fox News (May 23, 2023) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/irs-whistleblowers-claim-retaliation-connection-hunter-biden- complaint; 5 USC § 7211. 3 House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, June 7, 2023 Letter, (Jun. 7, 2023) https://waysandmeans.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/June-7-2023-Letter_Redacted.pdf.
4 Pub. L. No. 117-328. 5 Id.
Special Counsel Kerner July 5, 2023 Page 2 of 3
These provisions are consistent with and do not supersede, conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or liabilities created by existing statute or Executive order relating to (1) classified information, (2) communications to Congress, (3) the reporting to an Inspector General or the Office of Special Counsel of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or (4) any other whistleblower protection. The definitions, requirements, obligations, rights, sanctions, and liabilities created by controlling Executive orders and statutory provisions are incorporated into this agreement and are controlling.6
In addition, we have been made aware of an IRS email transmitted by Deputy IRS Commissioner for Services and Enforcement, Doug O’Donnell, to IRS employees regarding the lawful reporting of allegations of wrongdoing and protected whistleblower disclosures. In this email, the Deputy Commissioner states that he is writing because of concerns related to the reporting of allegations of wrongdoing and the lawful reporting of misconduct under 26 U.S.C. § 6103. While the email states the “IRS is deeply committed to protecting the role of whistleblowers,” it fails to inform IRS employees of their Constitutional and statutory right to make protected disclosures to Congress.
Under 26 U.S.C. § 6103(f)(5), IRS employees have the right to make lawful disclosures to Congress if they believe a tax return or return information “may relate to possible misconduct, maladministration, or taxpayer abuse.”7 However, the Deputy Commissioner’s email states IRS employees may make disclosers to a supervisor, management, the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, or the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration but blatantly fails to provide that IRS employees have the right to make lawful disclosures to Congress.8 This is another example of the IRS seeking to chill whistleblowers from reporting wrongdoing to Congress.
The importance of protecting whistleblowers from unlawful retaliation and informing whistleblowers about their rights under the law cannot be understated. After all, it is the law. Accordingly, we request that you immediately investigate all allegations of retaliation against these IRS whistleblowers and all violations related to the IRS’s failure to include the anti-gag provision as required by law. In addition, we request that you immediately seek the appropriate disciplinary actions against all who engaged in unlawful conduct against these whistleblowers. The DOJ and IRS must be held accountable for all instances of whistleblower retaliation and misconduct, and federal agencies cannot conceal their wrongdoing behind illegal nondisclosure directives and related documents.
Given the importance of these matters, please schedule a briefing to discuss the steps you have taken with respect to our requests no later than July 19, 2023. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Charles E. Grassley Ranking Member Committee on the Budget
Jason Smith Chairman Committee on Ways and Means
Ron Johnson Ranking Member Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
James Comer Chairman Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Sincerely,
Jim Jordan
Chairman Committee on the Judiciary
cc: The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General
Department of Justice
The Honorable J. Russell George Inspector General Department of the Treasury
The Lemonade Mermaid Store
Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!
Left: Our signature Fish Scales design tote bag in Citrus
Emmy-Award Winning Nonpartisan Investigative Journalist, New York Times Bestselling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure. I follow the facts, not the crowd.
The following is an excerpt from MedPage Today via Wall Street Journal. Fraudulent studies have infiltrated top scientific journals, “leading to thousands of retractions and millions of dollars in lost…
